Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law & Advocacy
  • Home
  • Support EBCALA
  • Unanswered Questions
    • Background on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
    • Inadequate Vaccine Safety Research and Conflicts of Interest
    • Response to “Anti-Vaccine Proponents Claim Court Paid for Autism Cases”
    • Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
  • Join
  • About
    • About Autism
    • Achievements
    • Board Members
    • Elizabeth Birt
    • Links
  • Areas of Law
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Special Education Law
    • Vaccine Law
  • News
    • Video

News

News Release

Home / News / CDC Recommends HPV Vaccine for Boys

CDC Recommends HPV Vaccine for Boys

Posted on: 11-1-2011 Posted in: Vaccine Law
Read transcript of HPV debate with Dr. Diane Harper and Dr. William Schaffner.

New York City, NY — The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended on October 25 that all 11- and 12-year-old boys receive the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine as part of their routine preventive healthcare.

On October 30, Dr. Diane Harper, principal investigator for the HPV vaccine and Professor of Medicine and Director, Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, stated on national television that “we don’t know enough” to be able to make this recommendation for boys.

Dr. Harper conducted clinical trials in boys that showed poor vaccine effectiveness. For nearly two in five boys, the vaccine’s protection wore off within a few years.

Dr. William Schaffner, paid Merck consultant, Chairman of the Department of Preventative Medicine at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and a non-voting ACIP member appeared in the televised debate with Dr. Harper.

He acknowledged this is  “a coordinated effort of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians, so that the general notion is that it’s time to do this…”

The professional medical associations Dr. Schaffner mentioned receive substantial donations from Merck, which manufactures Gardasil, the only HPV vaccine now recommended for boys.

EBCALA Communications Director Rebecca Estepp said, “It is extremely troubling that Dr. Harper, the HPV vaccine’s principal investigator, is concerned there’s not enough science for this recommendation. Dr. Harper is one of the most credible and impartial voices on HPV.  The ACIP, AAP and AAFP have moved forward prematurely in recommending this vaccine despite insufficient scientific research. Dr. Schaffner offered no scientific basis for his position except to say ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder.’”

Both boys and girls must receive three doses of Merck’s Gardasil vaccine to protect against disease; each dose costs more than $100, making the HPV vaccine the most expensive vaccine ever recommended by the CDC for universal use.

Dr. Harper also criticized California’s new law, AB499, which grants children as young as 12 years old the right to consent to preventive healthcare against sexually transmitted diseases, including the HPV vaccine, without parental knowledge.  Dr. Harper stated that this kind of medical interference in family health decision making is “not an appropriate thing for public health officials to be doing.”

The HPV vaccine has a troubling safety record, with more than 20,000 adverse event reports including 57 reports of deaths. All vaccines are legally considered to be “unavoidably unsafe.”  Since 1986, under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, vaccine manufacturers and doctors enjoy almost blanket legal liability protection from any harm that vaccines cause.  The 1986 law acknowledges that vaccines are inherently dangerous and are likely to cause death and severe injury to some.

EBCALA urges parents and caregivers to heed Dr. Harper’s warning that “we don’t know enough” for this HPV recommendation.

  • Popular Posts
  • Related Posts
  • The Politics of Autism–What's new in 2012?
    The Politics of Autism–What's new in 2012?
  • Who Decides If Children Are Vaccinated?
    Who Decides If Children Are Vaccinated?
  • Autism & the Law
    Autism & the Law
  • We Need Your Help at Autism One
    We Need Your Help at Autism One
  • The Politics of Autism–What's new in 2012?
    The Politics of Autism–What's new in 2012?
  • Who Decides If Children Are Vaccinated?
    Who Decides If Children Are Vaccinated?
  • Autism & the Law
    Autism & the Law
  • We Need Your Help at Autism One
    We Need Your Help at Autism One

News

  • Topics
  • Events

eNewsletter
Insurance Law
Media
Tributes
Vaccine Law
Video

Educational Programs
Fundraising Events

EBCALA - addressing the legal needs of the autism community
About Us
  • Our Mission
  • Achievements
  • Board Members
  • Elizabeth Birt
  • eNewsletter
  • Support EBCALA
  • Join EBCALA
  • Contact Us
Areas of Law
  • Amicus Briefs
  • Criminal Law
  • Family Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Special Education Law
  • Vaccine Law
Unanswered Questions
  • Overview
  • Background on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
  • Inadequate Vaccine Safety Research and Conflicts of Interest
  • Response to “Anti-Vaccine Proponents Claim Court Paid for Autism Cases”
  • Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Legal Training Conference
  • Overview
  • Multiple Autism Topics
  • Special Education Law
  • Register
  • Sponsor
Site
  • Links
  • Privacy
  • Site Map
  • Terms of Service
© 2010-2012 Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law & Advocacy | All Rights Reserved
TwitterStumbleUponRedditDiggdel.icio.usFacebookLinkedIn